- From: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
- Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 09:01:12 +0100
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Cc: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Hi Mark, hi Martin,
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 11:34:26AM +1100, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
> I had a look through the issues and their linked pulls; I saw one or two
> minor typos (pointed out in line notes, you should have received e-mails) but
> otherwise, looks good to me.
>
> These are very small changes, but I'd appreciate if other folks had a quick
> look as well.
I visited several of them with any possible comment in front of them or
"OK" if I have no objection :
#698 => OK
#697 => OK
#696 => maybe "if it cannot decompress a header block" would solve
the issue instead, as it covers various causes ?
#694 => OK
#692 => read 4 of them, seems OK
#690 (PRI safe & idempotent) => I don't know, I saw there was some debate
about this between Roy and Amos and I don't know if there was an
agreement (I missed it).
#689 => OK
#688 => OK
#686 => OK
#685 => OK
#684 => OK for both
#683 => OK
#679 => OK
#670 => OK
Willy
Received on Wednesday, 21 January 2015 08:01:40 UTC