Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest, "5.1 Stream States Push Requests"

I also suggest removal in the github issue. Only negative to this is we may
lose the original meaning the statement was intended to convey. Unless the
original meaning is lost or overly complicated it may be good to preserve.
Suggestions welcome.
On Jan 13, 2015 10:58 PM, "Martin Thomson" <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> On Jan 13, 2015 7:47 PM, "Scott Mitchell" <scott.k.mitch1@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >idle:
> >       All streams start in the "idle" state.  In this state, no frames
> >       have been exchanged.
> >
> > It seems like PRIORITY frames can be sent/received in the IDLE state
> without causing a state transition as illustrated in [figure 2](
> http://http2.github.io/http2-spec/#StreamStatesFigure).  If I am
> interpreting this correctly then the `no frames have been exchanged`
> statement is not necessarily correct if PRIORITY frames have been exchanged.
>
> I meant to reply to this earlier, but I think that the easiest resolution
> for this is to remove the offending sentence entirely.
>