Re: alpn identifiers (not again!)

On 9 June 2015 at 02:44, Stefan Eissing <> wrote:
> schemes are needed.

This is the part I'm not convinced of.  I think that it might be more
harmful in fact, but I'm not sure that I completely follow your logic.

> URI schemes denote protocol stacks.

This is something I disagree with, so maybe that's where we have a
disconnect.  URIs with a https scheme clearly do not describe a
protocol stack.

Received on Tuesday, 9 June 2015 17:06:06 UTC