- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2015 10:58:52 +1000
- To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- Cc: Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
+1 > On 28 May 2015, at 2:25 am, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 27 May 2015 at 02:06, Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz> wrote: >> >> Another straw-man: >> >> * must-ignore the service (not just extension) > > That's a stronger statement, but I think that it's a good tweak. > > It means that I can require support of an extension in order to use the service. > > It also means that if I want to add an optionally comprehended > attribute, I would need to repeat the service. That works. At least > until you have multiple attributes that are all independently > optionally supported. At which point, you might get a somewhat larger > than ideal header field. > -- Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/
Received on Monday, 1 June 2015 00:59:24 UTC