- From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 09:25:37 -0700
- To: Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 27 May 2015 at 02:06, Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz> wrote: > > Another straw-man: > > * must-ignore the service (not just extension) That's a stronger statement, but I think that it's a good tweak. It means that I can require support of an extension in order to use the service. It also means that if I want to add an optionally comprehended attribute, I would need to repeat the service. That works. At least until you have multiple attributes that are all independently optionally supported. At which point, you might get a somewhat larger than ideal header field.
Received on Wednesday, 27 May 2015 16:26:07 UTC