- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 14:16:52 +1000
- To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
- Cc: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, "draft-ietf-httpbis-tunnel-protocol@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-httpbis-tunnel-protocol@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-httpbis-tunnel-protocol.shepherd@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-httpbis-tunnel-protocol.shepherd@ietf.org>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
I've left a few editorial-ish notes on the change sets; see: https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/commit/0320e7623976b3b2773df9845879df9b6153199a https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/commit/12fd300c80e1336084c6f102317aba8ec2047ece Once Martin decides what to do with those, I think we're OK. Cheers, > On 13 May 2015, at 7:27 am, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> wrote: > >>> Where are we with this? >> >> from upthread: >> >>> All of these changes can be reviewed here: >>> https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/compare/barry?expand=1 >>> >>> If these make sense, I will merge that branch. >> >> I haven't seen any response to that. I'm happy to accept that the new >> section is not needed, but we are stalling on the issue of what ALPN >> __means__ and while I adopt the view I've tried to articulate (and the >> one Mark describes), it's not clear that this is the consensus view. >> I will defer to my betters on this. > > I'm OK to go with what you have in that update. I just wanted to hear > from the doc shepherd. > > Barry -- Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/
Received on Wednesday, 20 May 2015 04:17:22 UTC