- From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 17:17:53 +0000
- To: Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>
- cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
-------- In message <55522FBA.2010108@treenet.co.nz>, Amos Jeffries writes: >> If you use different keys for different users, then you have to add >> Vary: Encryption. > >Encryption is defined as a response header. Why would it be limited to responses ? >Vary lists request headers. Which is why we should think about "Accept-Encryption" >You cannot be both cacheable and use per-client keys (or payload for >that matter). "per-client" can trivially mean "per-group-of-clients" -- particularly so since this does not at all address or limit key-management. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Tuesday, 12 May 2015 17:18:20 UTC