- From: Sawood Alam <ibnesayeed@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 11:25:11 -0400
- To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Cc: ietf-http-wg <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 11 May 2015 15:25:59 UTC
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 11:16 AM, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> wrote: > -------- > In message < > CALOnmf9LeKoKg1xErVYW-uF1WME+LUZZef_ueYoEKU+-7kvLVw@mail.gmail.com> > , Sawood Alam writes: > > >> Nope, not only does HTTP/2.0 still use second granularity, it still > >> lugs timestamps around in ASCII format. > > > >Thanks for the quick response. Is there any discussion publicly available > >on this matter, why it was decided no to be changed? I guess the reason is > >probably backward compatibility, but I would like to know more about it. > > Improvements were proposed but not adopted. > Thanks! > > -- > Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 > phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 > FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe > Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. > -- Sawood Alam Department of Computer Science Old Dominion University Norfolk VA 23529
Received on Monday, 11 May 2015 15:25:59 UTC