On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 10:53 PM, Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> Whether the status code in the draft will be useful for us depends, in
> part, on the meaning as defined in the document. If it’s phrased so that it
> only applies to government-mandated censorship as opposed to other kinds of
> filtering (think net-nanny), then it won’t be useful for us. Otherwise, it
> might be useful.
>
So, please comment on the meaning as defined in the draft document. I
agree, if it suggests that the only legal obstacles are
government-mandated, that would be a bug. Does it?