Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-16.txt

+1
I do think both HTTP/2 and HPACK documents are ready for advancement
and they should get submitted to IESG asap
so that the IETF last call and the IESG review can start before the vacation period

br
Salvatore

On Dec 13, 2014, at 9:43 PM, "DRUTA, DAN" <dd5826@att.com>
 wrote:

> I also think we should get the documents submitted for IESG review sooner rather than waiting a few extra days.
> Holiday season is around the corner and any delay will push the review  window further out.
> 
> Regards,
> Dan
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gabriel Montenegro [mailto:Gabriel.Montenegro@microsoft.com] 
> Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2014 11:17 PM
> To: Mark Nottingham; HTTP Working Group
> Subject: RE: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-16.txt
> 
> Hi Mark,
> 
>> Our issues list is empty, and I believe we have consensus to publish these
>> documents.
> 
> We agree.
> 
>> Please have a look at the changes in this as well as HPACK-10, to verify that
>> they incorporate the changes as discussed.
>> 
>> I'm going to prepare the shepherd writeups and -- barring any surprises --
>> submit them all for publication in a couple of days.
> 
> Both HTTP/2 and HPACK are ready for advancement to IESG in our opinion. Is there any reason to wait even more days?
> 
>