RE: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-16.txt

I also think we should get the documents submitted for IESG review sooner rather than waiting a few extra days.
Holiday season is around the corner and any delay will push the review  window further out.

Regards,
Dan

-----Original Message-----
From: Gabriel Montenegro [mailto:Gabriel.Montenegro@microsoft.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2014 11:17 PM
To: Mark Nottingham; HTTP Working Group
Subject: RE: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-16.txt

Hi Mark,

> Our issues list is empty, and I believe we have consensus to publish these
> documents.

We agree.
 
> Please have a look at the changes in this as well as HPACK-10, to verify that
> they incorporate the changes as discussed.
> 
> I'm going to prepare the shepherd writeups and -- barring any surprises --
> submit them all for publication in a couple of days.

Both HTTP/2 and HPACK are ready for advancement to IESG in our opinion. Is there any reason to wait even more days?

Received on Saturday, 13 December 2014 19:44:49 UTC