Re: wordsmithing priority

On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 12:53 PM, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
wrote:

> On 9 December 2014 at 09:42, Patrick McManus <mcmanus@ducksong.com> wrote:
> >    more flexible expressions of priority.  Idle streams begin with a
> default
> >    priority (Section 5.3.5)."
>
> https://github.com/http2/http2-spec/pull/670
>
> Because I'm nice.
>

so true!


>
> > I propose just editing out the first sentence:
> >
> >   "If a PRIORITY frame is received with a stream identifier of 0x0, the
> >    recipient MUST respond with a connection error (Section 5.4.1) of
> >    type PROTOCOL_ERROR."
>
> I didn't go that far, but you should take a look at my last email and
> PR #669.  We had a mid-air collision on this very point.
>
>
ack - wfm.