Re: wordsmithing priority

On 9 December 2014 at 09:42, Patrick McManus <mcmanus@ducksong.com> wrote:
>    more flexible expressions of priority.  Idle streams begin with a default
>    priority (Section 5.3.5)."

https://github.com/http2/http2-spec/pull/670

Because I'm nice.

> I propose just editing out the first sentence:
>
>   "If a PRIORITY frame is received with a stream identifier of 0x0, the
>    recipient MUST respond with a connection error (Section 5.4.1) of
>    type PROTOCOL_ERROR."

I didn't go that far, but you should take a look at my last email and
PR #669.  We had a mid-air collision on this very point.

Received on Tuesday, 9 December 2014 17:53:34 UTC