- From: Jeff Pinner <jpinner@twitter.com>
- Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2014 21:33:40 -0800
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 9:20 PM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote: > Jeff, > > This seems like an optimisation -- everyone (including you) were willing to have the flag there beforehand. When we were trying to constrain the amount of server state required by only allowing PRIORITY on open streams there was no where else to put it. Willing yes, but there weren't other options. > > It doesn't cause any security or interop problems, so I'm inclined to hold this change to the same bar as similar ones brought up recently -- it needs pretty much universal acclaim to get through. Complete agree -- either this is an easy "yep, we should clean that up" or we shouldn't bother. > > Who supports this change, and is anyone against it? >
Received on Tuesday, 2 December 2014 05:34:07 UTC