- From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 14:56:16 +0000
- To: Mike Belshe <mike@belshe.com>
- cc: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>, Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com>, Roland Zink <roland@zinks.de>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
-------- In message <CABaLYCse=aZgU3b1UrJSPzZ8X4iBftWGVzModHbTD14GOdaZUg@mail.gmail.com> , Mike Belshe writes: >We don't need a separate document to define the >binding to TCP, Probably not, as no policy restrictions is put on the binding. > and we don't need a separate document to define the binding >to TLS. Yes you do, because we're no up to several pages of text trying to force all sorts of policy restrictions onto the TLS+HTTP/2.0 combination. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Tuesday, 18 November 2014 14:56:40 UTC