Re: Implementer intent -- option 3 for #578

On 23 October 2014 02:01, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:
> With that in mind, I'd like to hear from our implementers -- who is interested in this enough to implement a new draft and be able to bring it an interop on such a timeframe?

I'd implement for hyper.

Received on Thursday, 23 October 2014 07:56:03 UTC