- From: Jim Manico <jim@manico.net>
- Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 07:56:26 -0400
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: Matthew Kerwin <matthew@kerwin.net.au>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Forgive my ignorance with this question. Will another memo/standard/RFC be needed (such as http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2818) to explain the relationship between HTTP/2 and TLS? -- Jim Manico @Manicode (808) 652-3805 > On Oct 21, 2014, at 4:56 AM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote: > >> On 2014-10-21 08:49, Matthew Kerwin wrote: >> On 21 October 2014 16:22, Jim Manico <jim@manico.net >> <mailto:jim@manico.net>>wrote: >> >> Now that SSL 3.0 is dead due to POODLE, is there any chance it can >> be removed from the HTTP2 spec? It's security theatre at best right now. >> >> >> I didn't think SSL (any version) was in the HTTP/2 spec. >> ... > > Nor in HTTP/1.1... > > Best regards, Julian
Received on Tuesday, 21 October 2014 11:56:56 UTC