- From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2014 05:32:29 +0000
- To: Adrian Cole <adrian.f.cole@gmail.com>
- cc: Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com>, Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>, Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Jeff Pinner <jpinner@twitter.com>
-------- In message <CAHzwyDuuN=-DyGiWAfttwq7O_zUGOE=7kVf5J=qu6i_-A9ezfg@mail.gmail.com> , Adrian Cole writes: >> If an argument can be made that 2 byte encodings are still too large for >> dynamic headers, then instead >> of flipping back let's investigate how the 1 byte slots can be shared >> between static and dynamic. >FWIW, I'm happy to implement an alternate approach, if one comes out. >Thanks, Greg. Seriously... If we are that worried about compression-ratio, we should compress Date: and other timestamp headers to a 32 bit integer. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Wednesday, 15 October 2014 05:32:55 UTC