I support the current h2-14 text, except that if we are making a breaking change for other reason, then I support adding in values to the current static table entries. However, if we make a breaking change AND somebody can provide a large data set that is widely accepted as representative, then I'm happy to contribute time and effort to come up with an new optimised static table that may or may not be a little bit smaller depending on results. cheers On 8 October 2014 04:08, Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 04:49:05PM +0000, RUELLAN Herve wrote: > > I did some quick testing and the second proposal from Willy has almost no > > impact on the compaction size (on the HR test set from the compression > > testing suite). > > > > I implemented it in a slightly different way: I use a 1-bit flag to > determine > > if an index is into the static table or the dynamic table. It seemed much > > simpler to implement and less prone to errors. > > That's what I wanted initially but didn't find a spare bit. > It would be nice if Jeff could pass you some example data which exhibit > the trouble he faces so that we know if that can fix his issue or not. > > Thanks, > Willy > > > -- Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com> http://eclipse.org/jetty HTTP, SPDY, Websocket server and client that scales http://www.webtide.com advice and support for jetty and cometd.
Received on Tuesday, 7 October 2014 23:32:36 UTC