- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2014 17:59:33 +1100
- To: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
- Cc: Jeff Pinner <jpinner@twitter.com>
There doesn't seem to be support for making a change here; most people were against any change, and while there were a few other proposals made, they didn't get broad support. Since this isn't a security or interop issue, I'm inclined to close as WONTFIX. Does anybody have new information here, or can we move on? Cheers, On 7 Oct 2014, at 6:23 am, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote: > Thanks, Jeff. > > I see people have already started to respond to this. > > Everyone else, please do the same — if you think this needs more discussion, please do so, but I think we’re at a point where people can just state their preferences. > > Regards, > > > On 7 Oct 2014, at 2:02 am, Jeff Pinner <jpinner@twitter.com> wrote: > >> As request by Mark, I propose that the current HPACK draft be changed >> such that Sec. 2.3.3 Index Address Space reads, >> >> "Indices between 1 and the length of the dynamic table (inclusive) >> refer to elements in the dynamic table. >> >> Indices strictly greater than the length of the dynamic table refer to >> elements in the static table. The length of the dynamic table is >> subtracted from the index into the static table." >> >> with the associated diagram updated. This reverts the change made >> between draft -08 and -09 in the change log, "Exchanged header and >> static table positions." >> > > -- > Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/ > > > > -- Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/
Received on Sunday, 12 October 2014 07:00:02 UTC