Re: Restore Header Table and Static Table Indices

I too am a -1

On 10/6/14, 4:44 PM, "Michael Sweet" <msweet@apple.com> wrote:


>Also -1.
>
>> On Oct 6, 2014, at 2:44 PM, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
>>wrote:
>> 
>> --------
>> In message <D0582ED8.B1E9%sakulkar@akamai.com>, "Kulkarni, Saurabh"
>>writes:
>>> Same here, -1 on this. Our implementation (Akamai server) is much
>>>simpler
>>> now because of this.
>> 
>> Same here: -1 on this.
>> 
>> Having the static table first is much simpler and no credible data
>> has shown that putting the dynamic table first will lead to overall
>> improvement of compression.
>> 
>> And if compression is that important, we can get much more of it by
>> compressing timestamps algorithmically than by flipping these two
>> tables.
>> 
>> -- 
>> Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
>> phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
>> FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
>> Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by
>>incompetence.
>> 
>
>_________________________________________________________
>Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, PWG Chair
>
>

Received on Monday, 6 October 2014 21:18:10 UTC