- From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 11:40:07 -0700
- To: David Krauss <potswa@gmail.com>
- Cc: Daniel Sommermann <dcsommer@fb.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>, Yutaka Hirano <yhirano@google.com>
On 30 June 2014 11:23, David Krauss <potswa@gmail.com> wrote: >> That's an argument for the new application negotiation token. > > Such a proxy should only be put in a place where no negotiation is necessary. Bailing out at any END_SEGMENT would be acceptable then. There's an obvious counterargument to that one... That's fine, but if you want to operate sans-standard, then you can add your own END_SEGMENT. I really don't care either way here. I'm just enumerating the options, and noting that what is currently specified isn't particularly well-supported. Our responsibility is to either more clearly define it, or remove it.
Received on Monday, 30 June 2014 18:40:34 UTC