W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2014

Re: #535: No 1xx Status Codes

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 11:20:24 +0200
Message-ID: <53AD3758.5060308@gmx.de>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 2014-06-27 09:56, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> <https://github.com/http2/http2-spec/issues/535>
> This seems like a re-opening of <https://github.com/http2/http2-spec/issues/264>. We discussed it a fair amount in the Seattle interim, and there was pretty strong support in the room for getting rid of 1xx status, especially since they're poorly supported in implementations, almost non-existant in APIs, and often don't survive hop-to-hop.
> Julian, anything to add? I'm inclined to close this as a duplicate unless there's significant new information...

I still fail to see a compelling reason to remove them.

Why do we keep trailers, but not 1xx? I'd like to understand how we draw 
the line.

Best regards, Julian
Received on Friday, 27 June 2014 09:21:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:31 UTC