W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2014

Re: CONTINUATION was: #540: "jumbo" frames

From: Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 21:55:19 +0200
Message-ID: <CAH_y2NGGD5ZE6iG4XzSUB15X-3tiMecbEYhq3hrcgBUOL_UaXg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Cc: Mike Bishop <Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com>, "K.Morgan@iaea.org" <K.Morgan@iaea.org>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 26 June 2014 21:50, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote:

> Didn't I already explain that it's basically impossible to remove this
> uncertainty?

Why?  If a path negotiates a
please-transport-my-stupidly-large-kerberos-ticket extension, then surely
there should some reasonable certainty that such a ticket can be
transported over that path.

For the purposes of this conversation, I don't care how the extension sends
it, but if asked I would suggest in flow controlled data frames.


Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com>
http://eclipse.org/jetty HTTP, SPDY, Websocket server and client that scales
http://www.webtide.com  advice and support for jetty and cometd.
Received on Thursday, 26 June 2014 19:55:52 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:31 UTC