W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2014

Re: CONTINUATION was: #540: "jumbo" frames

From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 12:50:26 -0700
Message-ID: <CABkgnnU7qbiyWjH3zU7QL0-EUJP5eyW5bQo4y5rDriX8jzoYJg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com>
Cc: Mike Bishop <Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com>, "K.Morgan@iaea.org" <K.Morgan@iaea.org>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 26 June 2014 12:37, Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com> wrote:
> With the current h2 draft, many implementation will probably not support
> continuations at all, so such kerberos tickets are likely to receive a 413
> response unless there is prior negotiation along the path.   There is not
> even a mechanism to determine the max size supported by a path, only
> rejection if something is too big.  Surely a negotiated big header extension
> would be better than this uncertainty?

Didn't I already explain that it's basically impossible to remove this
uncertainty?
Received on Thursday, 26 June 2014 19:50:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:31 UTC