- From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 12:50:26 -0700
- To: Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com>
- Cc: Mike Bishop <Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com>, "K.Morgan@iaea.org" <K.Morgan@iaea.org>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 26 June 2014 12:37, Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com> wrote: > With the current h2 draft, many implementation will probably not support > continuations at all, so such kerberos tickets are likely to receive a 413 > response unless there is prior negotiation along the path. There is not > even a mechanism to determine the max size supported by a path, only > rejection if something is too big. Surely a negotiated big header extension > would be better than this uncertainty? Didn't I already explain that it's basically impossible to remove this uncertainty?
Received on Thursday, 26 June 2014 19:50:53 UTC