- From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 13:45:34 -0700
- To: Jason Greene <jason.greene@redhat.com>
- Cc: Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com>, Nicholas Hurley <hurley@todesschaf.org>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, "K.Morgan@iaea.org" <K.Morgan@iaea.org>, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>, Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>, Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com>, IETF HTTP WG <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Martin Dürst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
On 25 June 2014 13:30, Jason Greene <jason.greene@redhat.com> wrote: > That wasn’t clear to me in the text, thank you for clarifying the intention. The full range of possibilities are not enumerated, no. But that is the intent of p4 in http://http2.github.io/http2-spec/#extensibility . It's brief, partly as an economy thing, but mostly because it's not clear that all avenues of extension are equally valid. Before we know what extension options are actually viable, I'd rather not accidentally condone a particular non-viable one.
Received on Wednesday, 25 June 2014 20:46:02 UTC