- From: 陈智昌 <willchan@chromium.org>
- Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 02:34:37 -0700
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAA4WUYhhSqmcQafxaRW04197TeJeYOtX2iXPFfQNBbGyqZWjnA@mail.gmail.com>
It's possible I can dial in. I will be out for the weekend prior (+2 weekdays TBD) backpacking, so depending on how the schedule works out, maybe I'll call in. On Jun 18, 2014 12:13 AM, "Mark Nottingham" <mnot@mnot.net> wrote: > We requested two slots at the Toronto meeting, and should know roughly > when they are on Friday (US time) when the preliminary agenda is out. > > At the interim, we discussed whether we need a meeting in Toronto, because > we closed the issues list for HTTP/2 out then. However, we still have a > number of things to talk about: > > * The Alternative Services draft > * The Opportunistic Encryption / HTTP:// over TLS draft > * The proxy discussion > > There are also a few more directly HTTP/2 related things to discuss, such > as: > > * The issues that PHK and others have raised > * Testing and operational advice > > So, I'm inclined to keep the meeting slots in Toronto. I know that a few > people were making plans on the assumption that we weren't going to meet, > and apologise for the inconvenience. If there's interest, we can make sure > that we have better-than-usual remote participation facilities (perhaps > using WebRTC). > > I'll have a preliminary agenda available shortly. > > Cheers, > > > -- > Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/ > > > > >
Received on Wednesday, 18 June 2014 09:35:05 UTC