- From: Tatsuhiro Tsujikawa <tatsuhiro.t@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2014 01:05:00 +0900
- To: Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com>
- Cc: Ilari Liusvaara <ilari.liusvaara@elisanet.fi>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAPyZ6=Kq-27GLeNymQFWSxMDP05mTnAXGm7gpre1uc31fqrcPQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 12:45 AM, Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com> wrote: > Tatsuhiro, > > sorry but I'm still not understanding. If you want to clear the > reference set, there is a 1 byte code to send for that. It makes little > sense to set the header table size to 0 just to clear the reference set. > > You are mixing the capability of decoder and encoder. Clearing header table by sending SETTINGS_HEADER_TABLE_SIZE = 0 is done by decoder. On the other hand, sending context update to clear reference set is a job of encoder. And we have different compression context for decoder and encoder on each side. > This also raises another slight concern. When the copied static entry in > the dynamic table is eventually evicted, then that field is also evicted > from the reference set. Chances are that it will then be put straight back > in there. Seams pointless? > > Sorry, I don't understand. What is the problem here exactly? Best regards, Tatsuhiro Tsujikawa > So I'm still not getting why? > > cheers > > > > On 2 June 2014 17:22, Tatsuhiro Tsujikawa <tatsuhiro.t@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> >> On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 12:07 AM, Ilari Liusvaara < >> ilari.liusvaara@elisanet.fi> wrote: >> >>> On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 04:45:28PM +0200, Greg Wilkins wrote: >>> > The hpack draft 7 says in 3.2.1 : "The referenced static entry is >>> inserted >>> > at the beginning of the header table". >>> > >>> > I can't understand why this copy of a static entry to the dynamic >>> table is >>> > needed? Doesn't this mean that the static entry will now be known by >>> two >>> > indexes? Why is this copy needed? >>> >>> AFAIK, to avoid needing having to keep state bits (2 per entry[1]) for >>> the >>> static table. >>> >>> Yeah, the static table is 61 entries, thus the amount of state needed >>> would >>> be just 16 bytes. >>> >>> >>> [1] In set and emitted bits. >>> >>> >> Another reason is that we can clear reference set when setting >> SETTINGS_HEADER_TABLE_SIZE to 0 if we static entry is copied int dynamic >> header table when it is referenced. >> >> Best regards, >> Tatsuhiro Tsujikawa >> >> >> >>> >>> -Ilari >>> >>> >> > > > -- > Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com> > http://eclipse.org/jetty HTTP, SPDY, Websocket server and client that > scales > http://www.webtide.com advice and support for jetty and cometd. >
Received on Monday, 2 June 2014 16:05:47 UTC