W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2014

Re: Will HTTP/2.0 be green ?

From: Roland Zink <roland@zinks.de>
Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2014 12:04:43 +0200
Message-ID: <538C4C3B.5040901@zinks.de>
To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Maybe this should be the default and there should be a "energy 
considerations" section in addition to the "security considerations". 
Interesting in this case would be the comparison of HTTP2 in the clear 
compared to HTTP2 over TLS.

Regards,
Roland


On 01.06.2014 23:53, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <CABaLYCvTVJ+6nvFEnhKFyn-dYvSGNhJBsmpfhAAGtVdhj_gs0w@mail.gmail.com>
> , Mike Belshe writes:
>
>> Regardless, however, using less power wasn't an of objective in building
>> HTTP.  To revisit the requirements at this late stage is not a good idea.
>> We should stick to the plan.
> 	"Regardless, avoiding icebergs wasn't an objective in
> 	building this ship.  To revisit the requirements at this
> 	late stage is not a good idea.  We should hold the course."
>
> 		-- Captain Smith, RMS Titanic.
>
Received on Monday, 2 June 2014 10:05:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:31 UTC