- From: Roland Zink <roland@zinks.de>
- Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2014 12:04:43 +0200
- To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Maybe this should be the default and there should be a "energy considerations" section in addition to the "security considerations". Interesting in this case would be the comparison of HTTP2 in the clear compared to HTTP2 over TLS. Regards, Roland On 01.06.2014 23:53, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <CABaLYCvTVJ+6nvFEnhKFyn-dYvSGNhJBsmpfhAAGtVdhj_gs0w@mail.gmail.com> > , Mike Belshe writes: > >> Regardless, however, using less power wasn't an of objective in building >> HTTP. To revisit the requirements at this late stage is not a good idea. >> We should stick to the plan. > "Regardless, avoiding icebergs wasn't an objective in > building this ship. To revisit the requirements at this > late stage is not a good idea. We should hold the course." > > -- Captain Smith, RMS Titanic. >
Received on Monday, 2 June 2014 10:05:08 UTC