- From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 09:30:04 -0700
- To: Jason Greene <jason.greene@redhat.com>
- Cc: Michael Sweet <msweet@apple.com>, Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>, Matthew Kerwin <matthew@kerwin.net.au>, Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>, Simone Bordet <simone.bordet@gmail.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 30 May 2014 08:05, Jason Greene <jason.greene@redhat.com> wrote: > On this topic, has there been any consideration given to a potential need to alter the huffman code table after release? Perhaps after real world deployment someone determines that slightly different weighting would lead to improved packet size. My apologies if this was discussed in a past thread. Yes, we put this in the "significant change" category. That means "h3", most likely. If we bring back extensions, then there will be other ways to move to an arithmetic coder or typed fields or something crazy.
Received on Friday, 30 May 2014 16:30:33 UTC