- From: Richard Wheeldon (rwheeldo) <rwheeldo@cisco.com>
- Date: Thu, 29 May 2014 13:29:43 +0000
- To: Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com>
- CC: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
From: Greg Wilkins [mailto:gregw@intalio.com] > Any chance of getting that broken down by request headers verses response headers? Those were just the request headers. The following are the response header sizes from the same day for comparison. As expected, broadly similar but slightly smaller. Total Size of Response Headers (KB) Hits Total Bandwidth used (bytes) 0 6,150,368,648 4,818,463,093,379 1 135,595,631 226,554,380,248 2 23,400,680 78,690,794,667 3 11,201,634 53,346,476,556 4 6,087,922 38,790,955,943 5 2,813,066 21,299,008,205 6 989,603 8,696,416,852 7 518,503 4,616,427,850 8 325,843 3,138,491,657 9 207,968 2,331,339,013 10 163,296 2,017,103,198 11 136,098 1,845,784,911 12 112,042 1,621,155,531 13 86,510 1,335,213,171 14 74,170 1,216,208,789 15 61,877 1,076,372,856 16 53,320 988,223,924 17 46,907 918,692,632 18 39,220 805,060,723 19 32,196 698,219,067 20 29,261 660,685,062 21 21,936 510,140,410 22 19,436 478,537,442 23 15,504 386,104,802 25 14,338 387,132,367 26 13,650 375,504,978 24 13,616 352,044,271 27 11,338 321,842,045 29 10,003 304,576,697 28 9,796 289,315,178 30 5,538 174,006,785 31 4,338 140,023,490 32 2,148 71,182,461 33 1,477 50,875,071 34 1,177 41,067,240 35 928 32,955,327 36 809 30,803,686 59 489 29,261,095 58 419 24,894,135 37 373 14,050,953 38 328 12,590,352 39 222 8,481,291 40 145 2,881,228 57 127 7,500,047 42 106 4,253,873 44 106 3,717,316 41 100 4,493,721 56 88 5,058,537 43 59 2,154,826 55 57 3,174,147 45 56 1,790,793 46 45 1,690,620 47 42 1,563,170 54 35 1,951,776 53 32 1,822,445 49 28 1,530,165 50 25 1,401,037 51 25 1,075,256 52 23 1,231,341 48 20 945,773 61 3 9,275 63 2 1,996 60 1 2,810 62 1 1,669
Received on Thursday, 29 May 2014 13:30:13 UTC