W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2014

Re: HEADERS and flow control

From: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 9 May 2014 12:10:45 -0700
Message-ID: <CAP+FsNd6USXiPZR4b_FEJpy83QFxz0--feOH667_mKg1ZAHfAg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
What creates a surprising corner case?

Lets put it another way.
HEADERS which establish streams are control frames.
HEADERS which are in the middle of a stream, however, despite being control
frames are NOT doing any controlling. They are payload.

-=R


On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 12:02 PM, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>wrote:

> On 9 May 2014 11:42, Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com> wrote:
> > One of the potential users of HTTP2 whom I've spoken with wished strongly
> > that HEADERS after the first complete HEADERS block on a stream would be
> > subject to flow control. AFAICT, this would work better than what we have
> > today, without potentially triggering the deadlock scenario for many
> > non-browser usecases.
>
> /me needs more information.
>
> This is unlikely to affect most use cases, but it does create another
> potentially surprising corner case.  I think that I need (much)
> stronger justification.
>
Received on Friday, 9 May 2014 19:11:16 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:30 UTC