- From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 9 May 2014 12:02:12 -0700
- To: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 9 May 2014 11:42, Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com> wrote: > One of the potential users of HTTP2 whom I've spoken with wished strongly > that HEADERS after the first complete HEADERS block on a stream would be > subject to flow control. AFAICT, this would work better than what we have > today, without potentially triggering the deadlock scenario for many > non-browser usecases. /me needs more information. This is unlikely to affect most use cases, but it does create another potentially surprising corner case. I think that I need (much) stronger justification.
Received on Friday, 9 May 2014 19:02:40 UTC