W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2014

Re: HEADERS and flow control

From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 9 May 2014 12:02:12 -0700
Message-ID: <CABkgnnXEcnBJBkVD1YDpHTGj_rH+YxbcuxtCaEn1_C3yA6r4Sg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 9 May 2014 11:42, Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com> wrote:
> One of the potential users of HTTP2 whom I've spoken with wished strongly
> that HEADERS after the first complete HEADERS block on a stream would be
> subject to flow control. AFAICT, this would work better than what we have
> today, without potentially triggering the deadlock scenario for many
> non-browser usecases.

/me needs more information.

This is unlikely to affect most use cases, but it does create another
potentially surprising corner case.  I think that I need (much)
stronger justification.
Received on Friday, 9 May 2014 19:02:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:30 UTC