Re: HTTP/2 Priorities Proposal

option 1, please.
-=R


On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 11:26 AM, Martin Thomson
<martin.thomson@gmail.com>wrote:

> On 22 April 2014 18:43, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:
> > Martin, let's go ahead and incorporate it.
>
> In progress.
>
> Folks, it's an error to create a dependency from A -> A, but what if B
> depends on A, then A is reprioritized to depend on B?
>
> Option 1: It's possible to address this by moving B to the place of A
> first.
> Option 2: Explode.
>
> (This is an existing bug, not a special fault of Jeff's change.)
>
>