- From: Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>
- Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 03:39:28 +1200
- To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
On 22/04/2014 11:16 a.m., Martin Thomson wrote: > On 21 April 2014 15:57, Jeff Pinner <jpinner@twitter.com> wrote: >> The goals here are: >> >> 1) achieve a desired (to-be-provided) frame length distribution >> 2) achieve this with the minimum amount of padding >> 3) achieve the desired distribution regardless of the input data stream >> >> The intend is not to avoid reframing, it's to avoid a discontinuity in the >> output distribution. > > Then those goals can be achieved without changing anything. > Re-packaging frames into smaller chunks allows you to meet those > goals. > > I can understand if there are END_SEGMENT flags in place that this > complicates things. But completely-full frames with END_SEGMENT > should be a pathological case. My expectation is that we can cut these frames into two and place the END_SEGMENT only on the second frame. Amos
Received on Tuesday, 22 April 2014 15:40:12 UTC