W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2014

Re: GOAWAY and proxies (#458)

From: Jeff Pinner <jpinner@twitter.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2014 17:32:51 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+pLO_jdwKMJJR4gVs3=X4Qe86H-Aki6tX15xsvGeMrTS0MQDg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Daniel Sommermann <dcsommer@fb.com>
Cc: (wrong string) ™ˆ™˜Œ) <willchan@chromium.org>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
FWIW: We do out-of-band, active health-checking to signal draining.

On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 5:24 PM, Daniel Sommermann <dcsommer@fb.com> wrote:

> Actually, the extra ack GOAWAY only avoids this issue for high RPS proxy
> <-> server connections. For low RPS connections, the server's hard shutdown
> timeout would probably fire before all the extra MAX_CONCURRENT_STREAMS are
> requested, so the same old race condition still applies. Our proxy/server
> connections are extremely busy, so we haven't noticed this shortcoming of
> the workaround.
Received on Tuesday, 22 April 2014 00:33:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:30 UTC