W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2014

RE: Transfer-codings, mandatory content-coding support and intermediaries

From: <K.Morgan@iaea.org>
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2014 17:58:31 +0000
To: <pmcmanus@mozilla.com>
CC: <mnot@mnot.net>, <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, <daniel@haxx.se>, <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, <C.Brunhuber@iaea.org>, <matthew@kerwin.net.au>, <roland@zinks.de>
Message-ID: <0356EBBE092D394F9291DA01E8D28EC201129411BA@sem001pd.sg.iaea.org>
On 21 April 2014 15:24, pmcmanus@mozilla.com<mailto:pmcmanus@mozilla.com> wrote:
> I support keeping the implicit CE gzip

Not realistic IMO (given the growing list of problems caused by implicit CE gzip).

> and not doing anything regarding TE or hop-to-hop encodings for reasons discussed previously.

I infer that you think compression is important given your previous comments.  Any other ideas for requiring clients to support compression or are you only pinning your hopes on implicit CE gzip?

This email message is intended only for the use of the named recipient. Information contained in this email message and its attachments may be privileged, confidential and protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose this communication to others. Also please notify the sender by replying to this message and then delete it from your system.
Received on Monday, 21 April 2014 17:59:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:30 UTC