W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2014

Re: Transfer-codings, mandatory content-coding support and intermediaries

From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2014 13:43:37 +1000
Cc: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <CBBCE442-CD58-4182-B6CA-1FDB47C74AD4@mnot.net>
To: Matthew Kerwin <matthew@kerwin.net.au>

On 20 Apr 2014, at 12:50 pm, Matthew Kerwin <matthew@kerwin.net.au> wrote:

> On 20 April 2014 10:00, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:
> 
> ​[snip] I personally think Matthew's most recent proposal is quite reasonable, especially if it flips to being opt-out. While browsers might not use them, API folks could find this quite attractive (as we're hearing from the IAEA people).
> 
> 
> I assume you mean flipping to opt-in.

Yes; typing before coffee.

> Since you and Martin have both said you'd prefer it, and since it doesn't make a difference to me, I've switched the text around in my branch. I think there should probably be something in the COMPRESSED flag section to describe the error condition, or at least reference the setting. I've also changed zlib to gzip.​
> 
> 
> -- 
>   Matthew Kerwin
>   http://matthew.kerwin.net.au/

--
Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Sunday, 20 April 2014 03:44:04 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:30 UTC