Re: Transfer-codings, mandatory content-coding support and intermediaries from Matthew Kerwin on 2014-04-20 (ietf-http-wg@w3.org from April to June 2014)

From: Matthew Kerwin <matthew@kerwin.net.au>
Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2014 12:50:10 +1000
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Cc: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CACweHNCWr+hcDNVMhweVe96vEA45g_uRseBSWCsvhiJ0hDGhMg@mail.gmail.com>

On 20 April 2014 10:00, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:

>
> [snip]
>  I personally think Matthew's most recent proposal is quite reasonable,
> especially if it flips to being opt-out. While browsers might not use them,
> API folks could find this quite attractive (as we're hearing from the IAEA
> people).
>
>
I assume you mean flipping to opt-in. Since you and Martin have both said
you'd prefer it, and since it doesn't make a difference to me, I've
switched the text around in my branch. I think there should probably be
something in the COMPRESSED flag section to describe the error condition,
or at least reference the setting. I've also changed zlib to gzip.


-- 
  Matthew Kerwin
  http://matthew.kerwin.net.au/

Received on Sunday, 20 April 2014 02:50:37 UTC