W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2014

Dealing with BLOCKED

From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2014 16:37:18 +1000
Message-Id: <CDEA129C-B34A-4191-89B4-98D716D87EE4@mnot.net>
To: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
There's been a lot of discussion of this issue, but (predictably) no more data.

As indicated earlier, I think the best way to decide about this proposal is to get some operational experience with it, and one way to do that is to include it in the next implementation draft with a note to the effect that it's an "at risk" feature -- i.e. we'll pull it in the next draft if we don't agree to keep it in NYC.

Please comment on this in the next ~3 days; if we don't hear convincing arguments as to why this is a bad idea, we'll follow that plan.


Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Friday, 18 April 2014 06:35:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:30 UTC