W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2013

Re: Expect: + Upgrade: = ...

From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2013 10:59:40 -0700
Message-ID: <CABkgnnV==_J643L4+pci=1uejL=HhH4KNVwNK+x7=OJyemE-RA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Daniel Stenberg <daniel@haxx.se>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 2 September 2013 14:53, Daniel Stenberg <daniel@haxx.se> wrote:
> I guess another way would be to just not send both headers in the same
> request! =)

That's what I'm thinking.  Though 101 followed by 100 sounds tempting
because you would get flow control, it sort-of violates the HTTP/1.1
framing.

Mark currently has an issue around 100-continue
(https://github.com/http2/http2-spec/issues/18).  I'm deferring to him
on this matter.  I think that the direction we were heading was
something like: 100-continue + HTTP/2.0 = no.
Received on Tuesday, 3 September 2013 18:00:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:15 UTC