That isn't what Tatsuhiro was proposing-- he was proposing that such an object would cause an error to be emitted (and the only way to deal with that would be to close the connection). Even if that was what he was proposing, it is still additional complexity (a special case) which doesn't actually solve the complete problem of stupid encoders. -=R On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 1:31 PM, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>wrote: > On 28 August 2013 13:13, Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com> wrote: > > I hear this question from time to time :) > > I believe that the specific concern is with respect to the choice that > has been made. The current spec says: evacuate all from the table and > emit the header, where it could simply emit the header and leave the > header table alone. > > I don't see any particular reason to choose the current option over > what Tatsuhiro is (I think) suggesting, which allows implementations > to shortcut processing. Do you have a reason that you can share? >
Received on Wednesday, 28 August 2013 21:43:27 UTC