I think the effort of limiting the verbs (or making them self-descriptive, e.g. safe-or-not, body-or-not, etc.) is probably useful. I intend to spend zero effort towards it, and I hope that this group does not-- this seems like something outside of our charter, would definitely slow us down. Perhaps a BOF to charter some other effort on this? Or is this in charter? -=R On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 3:57 AM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>wrote: > On 2013-08-13 09:37, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > >> In message <**CAA4WUYg349TDDg6ZU4YSDNfhn39JL**mrFbPETG+GQ2Ym+xb=ajA@mail. >> **gmail.com <ajA@mail.gmail.com>> >> , =?UTF-8?B?**V2lsbGlhbSBDaGFuICjpmYjmmbrmmI**wp?= writes: >> >> I'm asking this since a colleague of mine wrote this blog post ( >>> http://www.onebigfluke.com/**2013/08/lets-remove-verbs-** >>> from-http-20.html<http://www.onebigfluke.com/2013/08/lets-remove-verbs-from-http-20.html> >>> ) >>> >> >> And he's absolutely right: There should only be two verbs: "READ-ONLY" >> and "READ-WRITE" aka GET/POST. >> >> The rest is just there to slow things down and introduce bugs. >> > > I believe what you say is based on the point of view of a very specific > component. > > In particular, it would be great if you could explain how exactly > extension methods "slow things down" or "introduce bugs". Example? > > Best regards, Julian > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 13 August 2013 15:24:39 UTC