W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2013

Re: http methods

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 12:57:47 +0200
Message-ID: <520A112B.7010200@gmx.de>
To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
CC: "William Chan (ι™ˆζ™Ίζ˜Œ)" <willchan@chromium.org>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 2013-08-13 09:37, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <CAA4WUYg349TDDg6ZU4YSDNfhn39JLmrFbPETG+GQ2Ym+xb=ajA@mail.gmail.com>
> , =?UTF-8?B?V2lsbGlhbSBDaGFuICjpmYjmmbrmmIwp?= writes:
>> I'm asking this since a colleague of mine wrote this blog post (
>> http://www.onebigfluke.com/2013/08/lets-remove-verbs-from-http-20.html)
> And he's absolutely right:  There should only be two verbs: "READ-ONLY"
> and "READ-WRITE" aka GET/POST.
> The rest is just there to slow things down and introduce bugs.

I believe what you say is based on the point of view of a very specific 

In particular, it would be great if you could explain how exactly 
extension methods "slow things down" or "introduce bugs". Example?

Best regards, Julian
Received on Tuesday, 13 August 2013 11:00:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:14 UTC