- From: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 08:20:26 -0700
- To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Cc: Mike Belshe <mike@belshe.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 13 August 2013 15:20:57 UTC
What are the good reasons to restrict this? One can always ignore a push by RSTing the promised stream. An endpoint must have logic to do this anyway, so this isn't adding any more code. Safe methods without bodies seems fine. cache invalidations != 304 get. -=R On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 4:13 AM, Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net> wrote: > * Mike Belshe wrote: > >I don't think this works - I don't believe the OPTIONS request is required > >to carry the query string, so you wouldn't know what response to push. > > (pls double check on the query string, but I think I'm right) > > Could you clarify what you want to have double checked? There are no > special provisions for query strings in "CORS" that I am aware of, and > it would be rather unwise to add any. > -- > Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de > Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de > 25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/ > >
Received on Tuesday, 13 August 2013 15:20:57 UTC