W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2013

Re: CONTINUATION Frame Size

From: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2013 18:21:52 -0700
Message-ID: <CABP7Rbcbb+fUxXktHUAX9Y8FvuQaXujWVWKYP70PjCHRS6mb+g@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Manger, James H" <James.H.Manger@team.telstra.com>
Cc: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
To be certain, I agree with you 100%... however, I've been told that
wasn't an option and that continuation frames MUST be contiguous...
although I personally don't buy it.

On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 6:13 PM, Manger, James H
<James.H.Manger@team.telstra.com> wrote:
>> Because sequences of header continuations are required to be
>> contiguous without any interleaving or multiplexing or whatnot...
>
> The solution isn't to allow CONTINUATION frames to be bigger.
> The solution is to fix the compression so it doesn't prevent
> interleaving with frames from other streams.
>
> --
> James Manger
Received on Tuesday, 13 August 2013 01:22:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:14 UTC