Re: Continuation Frames in draft -04 from Martin Thomson on 2013-08-06 (ietf-http-wg@w3.org from July to September 2013)

From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2013 15:46:15 +0200
To: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Cc: Jeff Pinner <jpinner@twitter.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CABkgnnWUGfn+51mxWm_OY8GBvF5JbzjLdAudq+LZP6Wh6HiwFw@mail.gmail.com>

On 5 August 2013 16:43, James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> wrote:
> ... with the obvious exception given to the END_HEADERS and
> END_PUSH_PROMISE flags.


I think that we will need an END_CONTINUATION flag, as well as
END_STREAM.  What is removed is the PRIORITY flag.

Received on Tuesday, 6 August 2013 13:46:43 UTC