W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2013

Re: Continuation Frames in draft -04

From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2013 15:46:15 +0200
Message-ID: <CABkgnnWUGfn+51mxWm_OY8GBvF5JbzjLdAudq+LZP6Wh6HiwFw@mail.gmail.com>
To: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Cc: Jeff Pinner <jpinner@twitter.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 5 August 2013 16:43, James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> wrote:
> ... with the obvious exception given to the END_HEADERS and
> END_PUSH_PROMISE flags.


I think that we will need an END_CONTINUATION flag, as well as
END_STREAM.  What is removed is the PRIORITY flag.
Received on Tuesday, 6 August 2013 13:46:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:14 UTC