Re: Continuation Frames in draft -04 from James M Snell on 2013-08-05 (ietf-http-wg@w3.org from July to September 2013)

From: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2013 07:43:41 -0700
To: Jeff Pinner <jpinner@twitter.com>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CABP7RbfkPmy+eOJHjQLzM8XQO62xV1EhdfJ38zkvAd1_Ov4SgQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 7:14 AM, Jeff Pinner <jpinner@twitter.com> wrote:
> Clarifications From Hamburg:
>
> Continued HEADERS and PUSH_PROMISE frames MUST contained the same flags as
> the initial frame with identical values.
> [snip]

... with the obvious exception given to the END_HEADERS and
END_PUSH_PROMISE flags.

Received on Monday, 5 August 2013 14:44:28 UTC