- From: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2013 01:14:09 -0700
- To: tsvg@ietf.org, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 6 August 2013 08:14:36 UTC
For those of you who missed it, at the HTTPBis/TSVG joint session, a question about what applications want from the transport (I really want to put quotes around that) came up. Here is a rendition of what was on the note that I jotted down in response to this question, and which I passed to people at the mic. (Apps-folks want the following) Deployed in 1996: ----------------------------------------- - Prioritization - Partial Reliability - "Shared" congestion between multiple streams - Security - No HOL blocking on stream X when loss on stream Y - Cheap/Fast channel/connection setup - Wide, "safe" deployment - Competes with TCP/HTTP/1.1 (performance-wise) - Multipath/roaming robustness, i.e. the "driveway" problem I'll reiterate that by far the most important feature is "is deployed". Nothing else matters until that is true, at least at the application-layer. -=R
Received on Tuesday, 6 August 2013 08:14:36 UTC