W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2013

Re: Additional status codes in HTTP/1.1

From: Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot@laposte.net>
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 09:51:05 +0200
Message-ID: <4251ed6b50ac66a402e3956437e5780a.squirrel@arekh.dyndns.org>
To: "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Cc: "Willy Tarreau" <w@1wt.eu>, ietf-http-wg@w3.org

Le Jeu 25 juillet 2013 08:18, Julian Reschke a écrit :
> On 2013-07-25 07:24, Willy Tarreau wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> A user notified me that status codes 428, 429, 431, 511 introduced in
>> RFC6585 by Mark & Roy are not mentionned at all in the current 1.1
>> draft.
>>
>> Shouldn't we copy them there, or at least add a reference to RFC6585 so
>> that implementers know that these codes exist ?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Willy
>
> No, that would send the wrong message.
>
> The list in the spec is not exhaustive; there's an IANA registry for a
> reason.

But is there any good reason not to consolidate the codes that were known
at the time?

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot
Received on Thursday, 25 July 2013 07:51:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:14 UTC